This writing practicum will assess the student’s ability to write a short essay comparing and contrasting followership and servant leadership. This assessment is part of the student’s GPA. – Essaylink

Compare and Contrast Essay Requirements
This writing practicum will assess the student’s ability to write a short essay comparing and contrasting followership and servant leadership. This assessment is part of the student’s GPA.
You will prepare a short essay comparing and contrasting followership and servant leadership. In order to receive a “GO,” you must achieve 70 or more points IAW the evaluation rubric provided. Receiving a “GO” on this evaluation is a graduation requirement. The essay must meet the following requirements: (a) Minimum of 250 words, no more than 750 words. (b) Font is Arial, 12pt. (c) Use standard margins: One inch from the left, right, and bottom edges. Do not justify right margins. (d) Use double spacing. (e) Utilize a graphic organizer. (f) Employ the Army Writing Style and standard written English. (g) Use the essay format. (h) Provide a strong purpose statement. (i) Use “second set of eyes.” Purpose: Bottom Line Up Front–
Levels of Achievement:
5-Advanced 20 (20.00%) points
4-Proficient 18 (18.00%) points
3-Competent 16.2 (16.20%) points
2-Developing 15.2 (15.20%) points
1-Learning 14 (14.00%) points
0-Nonperformer 13.8 (13.80%) points
Feedback:
Analysis: Evidence and Arguments–
Levels of Achievement:
5-Advanced 20 (20.00%) points
4-Proficient 18 (18.00%) points
3-Competent 16.2 (16.20%) points
2-Developing 15.2 (15.20%) points
1-Learning 14 (14.00%) points
0-Nonperformer 13.8 (13.80%) points
Feedback:
Syntax:Effective Sentence Constructions–
Levels of Achievement:
5-Advanced 20 (20.00%) points
4-Proficient 18 (18.00%) points
3-Competent 16.2 (16.20%) points
2-Developing 15.2 (15.20%) points
1-Learning 14 (14.00%) points
0-Nonperformer 13.8 (13.80%) points
Feedback:
Concision: The Most Information in the Least Space–
Levels of Achievement:
5-Advanced 20 (20.00%) points
4-Proficient 18 (18.00%) points
3-Competent 16.2 (16.20%) points
2-Developing 15.2 (15.20%) points
1-Learning 14 (14.00%) points
0-Nonperformer 13.8 (13.80%) points
Feedback:
Accuracy: Reducing Reader Distractions–
Levels of Achievement:
5-Advanced 20 (20.00%) points
4-Proficient 18 (18.00%) points
3-Competent 16.2 (16.20%) points
2-Developing 15.2 (15.20%) points
1-Learning 14 (14.00%) points
0-Nonperformer 13.8 (13.80%) points
Feedback:

Reviews, comments, and love from our customers and community:

Article Writing

Keep doing what you do, I am really impressed by the work done.

Alexender

Researcher

PowerPoint Presentation

I am speechless…WoW! Thank you so much!

Stacy V.

Part-time student

Dissertation & Thesis

This was a very well-written paper. Great work fast.

M.H.H. Tony

Student

Annotated Bibliography

I love working with this company. You always go above and beyond and exceed my expectations every time.

Francisca N.

Student

Book Report / Review

I received my order wayyyyyyy sooner than I expected. Couldn’t ask for more.

Mary J.

Student

Essay (Any Type)

On time, perfect paper

Prof. Kate (Ph.D)

Student

Case Study

Awesome! Great papers, and early!

Kaylin Green

Student

Proofreading & Editing

Thank you Dr. Rebecca for editing my essays! She completed my task literally in 3 hours. For sure will work with her again, she is great and follows all instructions

Rebecca L.

Researcher

Critical Thinking / Review

Extremely thorough summary, understanding and examples found for social science readings, with edits made as needed and on time. Transparent

Arnold W.

Customer

Coursework

Perfect!

Joshua W.

Student

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>