Question Description
I’m working on a history writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Write your report to the government of Karmin in the form of a three-paragraph essay:
1. What do you think your country’s foreign policy goals should be? Do you want to gain power and influence overseas or simply protect your sovereignty? Explain why you think these goals are appropriate, using historical examples.
2. Should the country align itself with NATO, the Warsaw Pact, or the Non Aligned Movement? Explain your answer, using historical examples.
3. However the country chooses to align itself, what type of foreign policy should it have toward the rest of the world? Should it be more aggressive or more diplomatic? Explain your answer, using historical examples.
1 attachmentsSlide 1 of 1attachment_1attachment_1
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Paragraph 1
Mastery (20)
Approaching (15)
Developing (10)
Details foreign policy goals that
echo the language of the lesson
such as “securing sovereignty” or
“attaining superpower status” and
uses historical evidence to argue
that these goals are appropriate.
Details foreign policy goals that
make sense but don’t necessarily Lists some foreign policy goals
use the language of the lesson. that make basic sense but does
Makes a general case for the not make a logical case for why
goals’ appropriateness but does they are appropriate.
not cite historical evidence.
Paragraph 2
Mastery (20)
Approaching (15)
Developing (10)
Clearly chooses to align with one
of the three sides (US, USSR, or
Unaligned Movement) and makes
a clear, detailed case for that
decision citing specific historical
examples.
Clearly chooses to align with one
of the three sides and makes a
general argument for it but does
not cite specific historical
examples.
Chooses to align with one of the
three sides but offers little in the
way of explanation OR talks
briefly about each side but does
not clearly chose one.
Paragraph 3
Mastery (20)
Approaching (15)
Developing (10)
Makes a clear choice between
hardline or diplomatic foreign
policy, demonstrates thorough
understanding of what that
means, and makes a strong case
for their decision citing specific
historical examples.
Makes a clear choice between
hardline or diplomatic foreign
policy, demonstrates incomplete
understanding of what that
means, and makes a general
argument for their decision but
does not cite specific historical
examples.
Chooses either hardline or
diplomatic foreign policy but
offers little in the way of
explanation OR talks briefly
about both types, showing
limited understanding, but does
not choose one or the other.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Explanation & Answer:
3 Paragraphs
Tags:
us history
foreign policy goals
Aligned Movement
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service.
